BENTLEY Chart 0500

This is a Chart for Benjamin Leeden Bentley and Elizabeth Jane Burton

married
June quarter
1883
St Ives district
Huntingdonshire
1
BENJAMIN LEEDEN BENTLEY
 born
23rd May 1863
Woodhurst
Huntingdonshire
occupation
1871 Scholar
1881 Ag Labourer
1901 Caretaker at School
1911 House Decorator		   2
ELIZABETH JANE BURTON
born about
1861
baptised
7th July 1861
Pidley
Huntingdonshire
occupation
1901 Caretaker at School
died about
1923
London
3
George Edward
(BENTLEY)
LEEDEN
 born
2nd July 1883
Pidley, Huntingdonshire
occupation
1891 Scholar
1901 Carpenter Improver
1911 Carpenter
died
1962
Bromley

married
28th July 1915
Islington
London
Agnes
Kate
WEEKES
born about
1886
baptised
30th November 1886
died
12th January 1980 		4
Gabriel E
BENTLEY
LEEDEN
born about
March quarter
1885
Pidley, Huntingdonshire
occupation
1891 Scholar
1911 House Decorator

married
17th March 1925
Islington
Middlesex
Jane
PUDDEFOOT
born about
1892
 5
Benjamin 
Burton
BENTLEY
born about
December quarter
1888
Pidley, Huntingdonshire
died
March quarter
1896
Islington district
Middlesex
Aged 8
  1. 1891 Main Street, Pidley, Huntingdonshire
    1901 1 Victoria Road, Lower Holloway, Islington, London. I am sure this is the correct family as Benjamin is down as being born n 1863 in Woodhurst, Huntingdonshire, Elizabeth in 1861 in Pidley and the eldest son George in 1883 in Pidley. The problem is they are down as LEEDEN's not BENTLEY's and as Benjamin's second name was LEEDEN I think the enumerator made a mistake and thought LEEDEN was the surname. The other problem is that the other child, one year younger than George Edward (Leeden) Bentley is down as John one year younger than George and also born in Pidley - this could be Gabriel. I have found the death of Benjamin Burton BENTLEY in Islington and we know that George and Gabriel married in London, so I would think it is 100 per cent certain that this is this family. The information given to me actually has the family from this point on down as LEEDEN not BENTLEY so perhaps they dropped the BENTLEY and went back to the LEEDEN name
    1911 Census - 3 Victoria Road Holloway, London
  2. 1871 Lane, Old Hurst, Huntingdonshire
    1881 Cottage, Old Hurst, Huntingdonshire
    1891 Main Street, Pidley, Huntingdonshire
    1901 1 Victoria Road, Lower Holloway, Islington, London. I am sure this is the correct family as Benjamin is down as being born n 1863 in Woodhurst, Huntingdonshire, Elizabeth in 1861 in Pidley and the eldest son George in 1883 in Pidley. The problem is they are down as LEEDEN's not BENTLEY's and as Benjamin's second name was LEEDEN I think the enumerator made a mistake and thought LEEDEN was the surname. The other problem is that the other child, one year younger than George Edward (Leeden) Bentley is down as John one year younger than George and also born in Pidley - this could be Gabriel. I have found the death of Benjamin Burton BENTLEY in Islington and we know that George and Gabriel married in London, so I would think it is 100 per cent certain that this is this family. The information given to me actually has the family from this point on down as LEEDEN not BENTLEY so perhaps they dropped the BENTLEY and went back to the LEEDEN name
    1911 Census - 3 Victoria Road Holloway, London
  3. 1891 Main Street, Pidley, Huntingdonshire
    1901 1 Victoria Road, Lower Holloway, Islington, London. I am sure this is the correct family as Benjamin is down as being born n 1863 in Woodhurst, Huntingdonshire, Elizabeth in 1861 in Pidley and the eldest son George in 1883 in Pidley. The problem is they are down as LEEDEN's not BENTLEY's and as Benjamin's second name was LEEDEN I think the enumerator made a mistake and thought LEEDEN was the surname. The other problem is that the other child, one year younger than George Edward (Leeden) Bentley is down as John one year younger than George and also born in Pidley - this could be Gabriel. I have found the death of Benjamin Burton BENTLEY in Islington and we know that George and Gabriel married in London, so I would think it is 100 per cent certain that this is this family. The information given to me actually has the family from this point on down as LEEDEN not BENTLEY so perhaps they dropped the BENTLEY and went back to the LEEDEN name
    1911 Census - 3 Victoria Road Holloway, London
  4. 1891 Main Street, Pidley, Huntingdonshire
    1901 1 Victoria Road, Lower Holloway, Islington, London. I am sure this is the correct family as Benjamin is down as being born n 1863 in Woodhurst, Huntingdonshire, Elizabeth in 1861 in Pidley and the eldest son George in 1883 in Pidley. The problem is they are down as LEEDEN's not BENTLEY's and as Benjamin's second name was LEEDEN I think the enumerator made a mistake and thought LEEDEN was the surname. The other problem is that the other child, one year younger than George Edward (Leeden) Bentley is down as John one year younger than George and also born in Pidley - this could be Gabriel. I have found the death of Benjamin Burton BENTLEY in Islington and we know that George and Gabriel married in London, so I would think it is 100 per cent certain that this is this family. The information given to me actually has the family from this point on down as LEEDEN not BENTLEY so perhaps they dropped the BENTLEY and went back to the LEEDEN name
    1911 Census - 3 Victoria Road Holloway, London
  5. 1891 Main Street, Pidley, Huntingdonshire

    Note there are many variations of the spelling of LEEDEN, ie LEADEN, LEEDING, LEADING, LEEDON, LEADON, LEEDER, LEADER  etc etc. I have called all the Charts LEEDEN and have shown the alternative spelling in (...) before the LEEDEN spelling. This is to keep conformity and ease of finding the charts. I think in several cases the name changed and has been kept with the alternative until the present day.

The idea of these charts is to give the information that we have found in the research we have done and put together and with the help of many other people who have contacted us over the past thirty odd years we have been researching our family. The idea is that you click on the Chart box in blue to be taken to the next family. There is now a large number of charts to be found and connections can be made to all the main families I am researching. If a chart has a box with the standard background it means that as yet I have not put the Chart on the Web.
To conform to the Data Protection Act all the Charts have been altered to exclude all details for living people other than the name.

Go to Chart index

Return to Home Page

If you have comments, alterations, corrections, amendments etc. please follow the details to be found on the Home Page to contact me.

Last updated Monday, November 21, 2011 15:03